METHODOLOGICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF ECOLOGIZATION OF FOREST EDUCATION IN RUSSIA

INTRODUCTION
 
 At the end of 2005, Professor V.G. Gorshkov, author scientific concept biotic regulation environment [Gorshkov, 1995], together with A.N. Makarieva, put forward theory pump atmospheric moisture 2006; In memory Viktor Georgievich 2020], according to which virgin forests and swamps provide transport moist air from ocean land. With this conclusion, authors are trying draw attention community authorities catastrophic consequences large-scale destruction forest cover in many countries, including Russia. open letter dated 05.05.2006 (Forests as guarantors existence Russian rivers life on land (on issue adopting a new Forest Code)) [https://www.bioticregulation.ru/life/les2_r.php] they noted: Scientific evidence has been obtained that precipitation is determined by activity undisturbed natural forests. An living using solar energy evaporated surface onto It shown droughts, fires, floods, well hurricanes tornadoes disturbance termination operation. The leads complete desertification continents."
 regard, need form competent universal scientists specialists various branches economy, who deeply versed environment, becoming increasingly acute. Appropriate environmental education should contribute formation development community.
 PROBLEM STATEMENT.
 low level forestry universities Russia hinders penetration ideas field policy, science practice.
 our opinion, problem comes fact disciplines poorly represented curricula training area: theoretical physics, evolutionary biology, meteorology climatology, ecological cycle knowledge (ecology, nature management, etc.), is, all those academic that, Gorshkova (2006) "form views environment" guide solving conservation biological diversity sustainable maintenance global climate.
 purpose study was comparative analysis content forming modern environment. objective identify potential direction for optimizing knowledge.
 MATERIALS AND METHODS OF STUDY
 When choosing survey, we used such an integral indicator rating 2019. Experts have traditionally adopted main criteria compiling rating: quality education, activity, international relations, demand university students employers. 496 participated (out 2067 country). 52 them accordance bachelor's degree program 35.03.01 Forestry. They annually graduate more than one thousand management [https://vuzoteka.ru/universities//Лесное-дело-35-03-01].
 source materials became surveyed Forestry, quantitative characteristic hours share load ecology. We selected included "TOP-10", representativeness, middle lower positions.
 data during survey allowed analyzing information contained websites institutes higher identifying problems way among future workers.
 STUDY RESULTS THEIR DISCUSSION
 Analyzing table, it difficult disagree associate professor Ural State Engineering University E.Yu. Serova [Serova, 2016, p. 23-24] raises certain questions there lack breadth outlook life, related fields - chemistry, economics, social sciences, etc. most often very narrow, technical, aimed at mastering implementation routine procedures developed over decades critically comprehending reworking these standpoint practice. rapid science, primarily biology little effect foundations standards education.
 Considering presence (be reminded necessary understanding role ecosystems processes functioning (forest) moisture, note following methodological methodical errors.
 1) 6 out 18 presented physics taught small amount 108 entire period study, only 54 hours, another not all;
 2) 5 universities, "downplayed" (180 or less study);
 3) 10 climatology were abridged version, disciplines, considered relevant workers, ignored when curricula;
 4) clearly belittled, one, ecology discipline curriculum;
 Only 3 (items 1, 2 4 Table identified errors hindering CONCLUSIONS
 To repair current situation needed be essentially adjusted increasing "guarantors land." idea being implemented leaders education: National Research Tomsk University, Pacific Siberian Science Technology. significant number devoted (physics, meteorology, ecology) reflecting methodology